Mid-Year City Budget Review Highlights Financial Pressure

Hermosa Beach faces a $548K budget shortfall at midyear, with projected spending increases vs. original forecast outpacing revenue gains 3-to-1. Staff proposes one-time funds to close the gap for the third straight year.

Mid-Year City Budget Review Highlights Financial Pressure

The City of Hermosa Beach is projected to end the current fiscal year with a General Fund shortfall of almost $550,000, according to a midyear budget review due to be presented to City Council next week.

Staff is recommending the council close the gap entirely with one-time savings: $235,594 from the salary and benefits of the deputy city manager position eliminated last June, and $312,413 from a contingency created through a Proposition A fund exchange agreement with the City of West Hollywood.

It is the third consecutive year the city has relied on non-recurring funds to balance its operating budget. A total of $909,362 in one-time money will have been used to balance the FY 2025-26 budget when the original adoption and midyear adjustments are combined.

The review paints a picture of a city where costs are accelerating faster than its tax base can support. General Fund revenues are projected to increase by $552,347, or about 1 percent over the amended budget. Expenditures are projected to increase by $1,835,257, more than three times the revenue gain.

Hermosa Beach FY 2025-26 Midyear Budget Review | The Hermosa Review
The Hermosa Review · Infographic

Follow The Money

Hermosa Beach FY 2025-26 midyear budget review


Revised revenue
$56.1M
+$552K from adopted budget
Revised expenditures
$57.0M
+$1.84M from adopted budget
Projected shortfall
-$548K
Covered by one-time funds
How a $900K gap becomes a $548K shortfall
1
The city expected to spend about $900,000 more than it would collect in taxes and fees this year.
2
To cover that, it started the fiscal year with $361,355 in one-time savings carried over from prior years, already set aside to fill the gap.
3
But costs rose faster than planned, mostly from new employee contracts. The gap grew, and the $361K cushion now falls $548,007 short.
4
To make up the difference, staff is tapping two more pots of one-time money: $235,594 from the salary saved by eliminating the deputy city manager, and $312,413 from a fund-swap deal with West Hollywood.
Total one-time savings used to balance this year's budget: $909,362. That money can't be spent again next year.
01 Revenue changes at midyear

Parking meter rate hikes and plan-check fees drove the gains. Property tax softness, facility closures, and weaker permits pulled in the other direction.

Service charges
+$757,573
Transfers in
+$175,112
Other revenue
+$130,000
Utility user tax
+$10,792
Other taxes
-$4,074
Sales taxes
-$46,000
Use of money
-$50,284
Licenses/permits
-$87,355
Property taxes
-$158,305
02 Where spending increased

New labor contracts account for $1.3M of the $1.84M increase. Police labor alone adds $913K. The City Attorney budget jumps 42%.

Police
+$925,663
$913K labor from new MOUs. $6K ergonomic chairs. $6.5K shooting range (offset by firearm resale).
Management support
+$226,128
$60K parking citation collection fees. $9.3K parking/Lot A studies. Revenue services, finance staffing.
Parks & recreation
+$175,743
Labor cost adjustments from new bargaining unit agreements.
Equipment replacement
+$160,000
2 Ford Explorers ($107K). AEDs for all patrol/CSO vehicles ($35K). LARIAC aerial imagery ($22K).
Community development
-$6,110 net
$163K pension savings offset by $157K in contract services: permit tech, plan review, housing trust, training.
Prospective expenditures
+$101,420
Replenishing contingency fund depleted by CSG consultant, CM recruitment, rec software, janitorial contract.
03 Plugging the hole: one-time funds used to balance FY 2026

The city has used non-recurring money to balance each of the last three budgets. This year: $909,362 total between the original adoption and midyear.

$169K
$144K
$236K
$312K
FY23 Prop A exchange ($48K)
FY25 midyear savings ($169K)
Compensated absences ($144K)
Deputy CM elimination ($236K)
West Hollywood Prop A contingency ($312K)
Key context
The $235,594 from the eliminated deputy city manager position is a one-time savings that cannot recur. The $312,413 from the Proposition A fund exchange with West Hollywood draws down a $660,000 stabilization contingency established in June 2025, leaving $347,587 remaining. Once these assigned balances are spent, they are gone.
04 Five-year outlook: the scissors

The city's own forecast, presented at budget adoption in June 2025, shows expenditures outpacing revenue by a widening margin through FY 2030-31. Structural drivers include LA County Fire contract negotiations, CIP replenishment, and rising personnel costs.

Revenue Expenditures Structural gap
Source: City of Hermosa Beach Staff Report
Infographic by The Hermosa Review

Where the money comes from

The revenue picture is mixed. The largest positive movement comes from parking meters, where the rate increases adopted in October 2025 are projected to generate roughly $635,000 in additional revenue this fiscal year. Plan-check fees are also running ahead of budget by approximately $240,000, reflecting construction activity in the first half of the year.

Those gains are partially offset by softness in property taxes, the city's single largest revenue source. The secured property tax estimate dropped 1.89 percent from the original budget due to higher-than-anticipated delinquency rates and successful valuation appeals from the prior fiscal year. The revised estimate for current-year secured property taxes is $21.4 million, within a total property tax line of $26.6 million.

Sales tax revenue is down a projected $46,000, with growth in restaurants and hotels offset by declines in food and drug stores and auto sales. The city's sales tax consultant, HdL Companies, provided the updated estimates.

Sales tax receipts are down, not helped by several high profile closures and vacancies

Transient occupancy tax, the city's hotel tax, is holding steady at its budgeted level of $5.19 million through the first half of the year.

Two facility closures are dragging on revenue. The Kelly Courts closure has reduced pickleball reservation income by an estimated $45,500, and the delayed reopening of the Clark Building is further cutting into community center rental revenue. The PARK After School Program is also under-enrolled by roughly $50,000.

A one-time $100,000 reimbursement from the 2025 bond issuance for the Greenwich Village North undergrounding assessment district accounts for most of the $130,000 increase in the other revenue category.

Where the money goes

Labor costs are the primary driver of the expenditure increase. The recently negotiated memoranda of understanding with the city's employee bargaining units account for approximately $1.3 million of the $1.84 million midyear spending increase. The Police Department alone absorbed $913,000 in additional labor costs from the new contracts.

The City Attorney budget is increasing $200,000, from $480,000 to $680,000, a 42 percent jump attributed to activity in the first half of the year. The staff report does not specify what legal matters are driving the increase.

Community Development needs $157,000 more for contract services, including $60,000 for a contracted permit technician to support new Accela permitting software activation and state-mandated reporting, $50,000 for outside plan review, $37,000 for the city's match to the South Bay Regional Housing Trust (approved by council on March 10), and $10,000 for departmental training.

The prospective expenditures account, a contingency fund originally budgeted at $200,000, was nearly depleted in the first half of the year. It covered the CSG consultant contract amendment, the city manager executive recruitment, recreation management software implementation, and a janitorial services contract. Staff is requesting it be replenished to $200,000.

Management Support includes a $60,000 increase for third-party collection fees tied to an expected increase in parking citations, and a net $9,275 increase in the city manager's budget to fund studies of parking operations and the Downtown Lot A.

Donations become capital projects

Staff is requesting $550,000 in capital appropriations from restricted donation fund balances for two projects. The larger is a $500,000 monument sign funded by a donation from Chuck and Missy Sheldon, accepted by the council in December 2025. The smaller is a $50,000 marquee sign funded by a historic donation from the Hermosa Beach Chamber of Commerce dating back over a decade.

The five-year picture

The staff report includes a five-year General Fund forecast presented during the June 2025 budget adoption. The projection shows expenditures and revenues nearly converging in the current year but then diverging sharply through FY 2030-31, when the gap is projected to reach approximately $4.2 million.

Staff attributes the structural pressure to several factors: pending contract negotiations with the Los Angeles County Fire Department for fire protection, beach operations, and lifeguard services; the need to replenish the capital improvement fund for critical infrastructure projects; rising contract service costs; and personnel and benefit cost increases.

The report recommends that the council approve all proposed fund transactions and assign the remaining $2.2 million in unspent FY 2024-25 funds to support development of the FY 2026-27 budget.

The midyear budget review is on the council's regular agenda for Monday, March 24.


FURTHER READING

LA County Wants to Raise Sales Tax by 0.5% for Healthcare. Here’s What It Means for Hermosa Beach.
Proposed sales tax hike would hit local pockets for an extra 0.5% to raise money for an LA County Healthcare proposal.

City Yard Renovation Project Takes Major Step Forward After Years of Delays
The Hermosa Beach City Council unanimously approved hiring an owner’s representative for the long-stalled city yard renovation project Tuesday night, marking a significant milestone in efforts to modernize the aging municipal facility at 555 6th Street. The council authorized a contract with Cumming Management Group for up to $565,000

Great! You’ve successfully signed up.

Welcome back! You've successfully signed in.

You've successfully subscribed to The Hermosa Review.

Success! Check your email for magic link to sign-in.

Success! Your billing info has been updated.

Your billing was not updated.